Outdoor Equipment Brand Pacing $400 a Day at 14% ACOS
Most engagements open with a brand asking us to cut wasted spend, so this one stood out, because an outdoor and fitness equipment brand with two product lines asked us to spend more. The brand approved roughly $350 to $400 a day of ad spend, and the mandate was to deploy all of it without letting efficiency slide anywhere in the account. That turns spend into a first class metric rather than a byproduct, because a day that ends under budget is a miss even when the ACOS looks clean.
We have spent ten years in Amazon e-commerce and managed over $10M in ad spend, and deploying budget fully is its own discipline. Underspending is a failure state the same as overspending, because every unspent dollar is demand the brand paid us to capture and we left sitting on the table.
Our first move in June was subtraction, because you cannot pace an account up while another part quietly drains the budget you are trying to place. We paused a Sponsored Display campaign that had been bleeding spend with no sales in 14 days, so those dollars could flow to targets that convert.
From there we ran the daily budget cap like a throttle, because the cap is the only lever that controls pace without touching the structure underneath it. Structure changes are slow and noisy, because a paused campaign loses its learning and a rebuilt ad group resets its history, so we save structural surgery for problems the cap cannot solve. We moved the cap from $310 to $300 early in the month, then pulled it down to $250 mid month when pacing ran hot, and brought it back up to $290 once efficiency stabilized. Each move was small on purpose, so the account never lurched, and the campaigns underneath kept learning on a steady flow of traffic instead of absorbing shocks.
What ran under the cap
Under the cap we set $5 daily floors on every campaign running below 2 ROAS, so those campaigns stayed alive and kept collecting data without drinking budget the winners needed. We cut bids 30 percent on targets that were spending with no sales in 14 days, and we manually optimized every target above 2 ROAS that was producing orders. That split matters, because the floors protect optionality, the cuts stop the bleeding, and the manual work on proven targets is where the 14 percent ACOS comes from.
We also split tracking by format instead of watching one blended number, because a blended daily total hides where the pacing pressure actually comes from. Early in the month Sponsored Products averaged $267 a day, Sponsored Brands averaged $75.60, and Sponsored Display averaged $30.70, which together made up the $373 daily average.
| Format | Average daily spend, early June |
|---|---|
| Sponsored Products | $267 |
| Sponsored Brands | $75.60 |
| Sponsored Display | $30.70 |
| All formats | $373 daily average |
Every figure comes from our June tracking for this account, and that format split reflects the daily averages early in the month before the mid month cap moves.
By the end of June the account averaged $386 a day in spend against the $400 target, and ACOS held at 14 percent while the budget deployed. That pace did not happen by luck, because every week we compared the run rate to the target and nudged the cap before any gap could compound. The assignment shows up in two numbers, because the spend landed almost exactly where the brand wanted it, and the efficiency never paid for the pacing.
With pacing proven, we launched competitor product and keyword targeting for the two product lines, so the remaining headroom under the cap had somewhere productive to go. We manage 15 to 20 accounts concurrently, and the pattern holds on every one of them, because a budget cap managed like a throttle beats structural surgery for controlling pace. If your brand approves real budget, the job is to place all of it well, and that is a different skill from shaving ACOS on a small account.
← Back to all case studies